Idaho Archives - Page 7 of 7 - Sports Line Analytics

January 30, 2016

NCAAB Portland State at Idaho Spread Analysis Jan-30-2016

NCAAB: Portland State at Idaho

Team Performance Analysis for Spread Results

The chart below shows the historical team performance for Idaho and Portland State against their respective lines.

It shows last 20 games of history of each team’s performance. We can then use the trends to analyze strength and weakness in the spreads.

We search for winning(up) trends, losing (down) trends and extreme patterns that provide sports betting opportunities.

We can see from the chart above that PORST is outperforming IDAHO.

Check out how the Spreads compare here: NCAAB Spreads .

The below chart is the historical lines for each team:

The below chart is the historical scores for each team:

January 30, 2016

NCAAB Portland State at Idaho Totals Jan-30-2016

NCAAB: Portland State at Idaho

Combined Team Performance Analysis for Totals

The chart below shows the historical combined team performance for Idaho and Portland State against their respective over under lines.

It shows last 20 games of history of combined performance. We can then use the trends to analyze strength and weakness in the over under lines.

We search for winning(up) trends, losing (down) trends and extreme patterns that provide a sports betting opportunities.

We can see from the chart above that on average the combined performance of the two teams over the last 20 games has been Under their respective Over Under Lines. The 3 game combined trend of team scoring performance vs their lines has been Under.

Check out how the Totals compare here: NCAAB Totals .

The below chart is the historical lines for each team:

The below chart is the historical scores for each team:

January 28, 2016January 28, 2016

NCAAB Sacramento State at Idaho Totals Jan-28-2016

NCAAB: Sacramento State at Idaho

Combined Team Performance Analysis for Totals

The chart below shows the historical combined team performance for Idaho and Sacramento State against their respective over under lines.

It shows last 20 games of history of combined performance. We can then use the trends to analyze strength and weakness in the over under lines.

NCAAB Totals Performance

We search for winning(up) trends, losing (down) trends and divergence patterns that provide a sports betting opportunities.

Check out how the Totals compare here: NCAAB Totals .

The below chart is the historical lines for each team:
NCAAB Totals Odds History

The below chart is the historical scores for each team:
NCAAB Scores

January 28, 2016

NCAAB Sacramento State at Idaho Spread Analysis Jan-28-2016

NCAAB: Sacramento State at Idaho

Team Performance Analysis for Spread Results

The chart below shows the historical team performance for Idaho and Sacramento State against their respective lines.

It shows last 20 games of history of each team’s performance. We can then use the trends to analyze strength and weakness in the spreads.

We search for winning(up) trends, losing (down) trends and divergence patterns that provide sports betting opportunities.

We can see from the chart above that IDAHO is outperforming SACRA.

Check out how the Spreads compare here: NCAAB Spreads .

The below chart is the historical lines for each team:

The below chart is the historical scores for each team:

January 28, 2016

NCAAB Sacramento State at Idaho Moneyline Jan-28-2016

NCAAB: Sacramento State at Idaho

Team Performance and Analysis for Moneylines

The chart below shows the historical team performance for Idaho and Sacramento State .

It shows last 20 games of history of combined performance. We can then use the trends to analyze strength and weakness in the Moneylines.

We search for winning(up) trends, losing (down) trends and divergence patterns that provide a sports betting opportunities.

We can see from the chart above that IDAHO is outperforming SACRA.

Check out how the Odds compare here: NCAAB Moneyline Odds .

The below chart is the historical lines for each team:

The below chart is the historical scores for each team: